(syntax) The relationship between a node in a parse tree and its sibling nodes (usually meaning the children of the first branching node that dominates the node) and all the sibling nodes' children..
의미별 영어 정의
(syntax) The relationship between a node in a parse tree and its sibling nodes (usually meaning the children of the first branching node that dominates the node) and all the sibling nodes' children.
(syntax, transitive) To dominate in a c-command relationship.
예문
Given the key assumption of Trace Theory that a moved constituent leaves behind a coindexed trace, we might formulate the relevant principle that transformations cannot downgrade constituents in terms of an equivalent condition that a moved constituent cannot occupy a lower position than any of its traces. This principle might be stated more formally as in (85) below
(85) C-COMMAND CONDITION
(85) A moved constituent must c-command ( = constituent-command)
(85) each of its traces at S-structure (X c-commands Y just in case the
(85) first branching node dominating X dominates Y, and neither X
(85) nor Y dominates the other)
현재 검증된 한국어 뜻은 준비 중이며 영어 정의는 “(syntax) The relationship between a node in a parse tree and its sibling nodes (usually meaning the children of the first branching node that dominates the node) and all the sibling nodes' children.”입니다.
c-command의 동의어는 무엇인가요?
문장 속 의미에 따라 가까운 동의어가 달라집니다.
c-command의 반의어는 무엇인가요?
정확한 반대말은 사용된 의미에 따라 달라집니다.
c-command를 문장에서 어떻게 쓰나요?
Given the key assumption of Trace Theory that a moved constituent leaves behind a coindexed trace, we might formulate the relevant principle that transformations cannot downgrade constituents in terms of an equivalent condition that a moved constituent cannot occupy a lower position than any of its traces. This principle might be stated more formally as in (85) below
(85) C-COMMAND CONDITION
(85) A moved constituent must c-command ( = constituent-command)
(85) each of its traces at S-structure (X c-commands Y just in case the
(85) first branching node dominating X dominates Y, and neither X
(85) nor Y dominates the other)